Work dossier · summary and historical context
The Visio Danielis is a Greek apocalyptic text pseudepigraphally attributed to John Chrysostom (c. 347–407). It is not part of his authentic corpus and likely dates from the 7th–9th centuries, reflecting later Byzantine eschatological concerns. The text reinterprets Danielic prophecies, particularly the four kingdoms from Daniel 7, as Ethiopians, Macedonians, Greeks, and Romans. It circulated in Greek and Slavonic traditions, often used in medieval Orthodox piety to lend authority to its prophecies. The edition on khazarzar is based on a single manuscript tradition without critical apparatus, limiting assessment of textual variants. The work lacks translation or commentary, requiring readers to supply knowledge of apocalyptic motifs.
The Visio Danielis exemplifies the adaptation of biblical prophecy to later historical circumstances, particularly the reinterpretation of Daniel's four kingdoms. It demonstrates how pseudepigraphal attribution to authoritative figures like Chrysostom shaped medieval Orthodox eschatology. The text's circulation in Greek and Slavonic traditions highlights cross-cultural transmission of apocalyptic ideas. It also provides insight into Byzantine responses to political and religious crises, though its fragmentary transmission limits historical certainty.
The Visio Danielis was composed in Greek, likely in a Byzantine monastic or ecclesiastical setting between the 7th and 9th centuries. This period saw the rise of apocalyptic literature responding to Arab conquests, iconoclasm, and eschatological expectations. The text's attribution to John Chrysostom, a revered Church Father, was a common pseudepigraphal strategy to enhance authority. It circulated alongside other Danielic apocrypha and was translated into Slavonic, indicating its use in Orthodox communities beyond Byzantium. The four-kingdom schema (Ethiopians, Macedonians, Greeks, Romans) reflects late antique world-empire traditions, often linked to Daniel's beasts. The text's survival in a single manuscript tradition suggests limited but persistent transmission, likely in liturgical or homiletic contexts. Its style and content align with later Byzantine apocalyptic, not Chrysostom's homiletic register.
Apparatus · what the pipeline recorded
| Coptic | Rendering | Count | First |
|---|---|---|---|
| no glossary terms recorded | |||