Work dossier · summary and historical context
Non esse desperandum (Greek: Περὶ τοῦ μὴ ἀπελπίζειν) is a hortatory address traditionally attributed to John Chrysostom (c. 349–407). The work urges perseverance in adversity, discourages cursing enemies, and counsels against despair when prayers go unanswered, linking this to domestic peace. It survives in multiple Greek manuscripts but lacks a critical edition; the source is a digital transcription. The text is not listed in standard Chrysostom corpora (PG, CPG), and its attribution rests solely on manuscript ascription. It may be spurious or a later compilation. The work includes an allusion to praying for enemies (cf. Matthew 5:44; Luke 6:27–28) and references the tax collector parable (Luke 18:9–14) as a model of repentance.
Non esse desperandum illustrates the pastoral concerns of late antique Christianity, particularly the problem of despair and the moral discipline of prayer. Its attribution to Chrysostom, even if uncertain, connects it to a major patristic figure known for practical ethics. The work's survival outside standard corpora highlights the fluidity of the Chrysostom corpus and the need for critical editions. It also preserves early Christian exegesis of Gospel passages on enemies and repentance.
The work is undated and its place of composition unknown. If authentically by John Chrysostom, it would belong to the late fourth or early fifth century, likely in Antioch (where Chrysostom served as deacon and presbyter, c. 386–397) or Constantinople (where he was patriarch, 398–404). The genre is a homily or hortatory address, delivered to a Christian congregation familiar with scriptural allusions and conventional gestures of mourning (striking face and breast). The numeral αʹ suggests it was part of a series on the Lord's Prayer and moral exhortation. The text survives in multiple Greek manuscripts, but no critical edition exists; the digital transcription (khazarzar) provides no apparatus or variant readings. Its absence from PG and CPG raises doubts about authenticity; it may be a later compilation or a spurious attribution. The work's reception history is unclear, and it has not been widely studied.
Apparatus · what the pipeline recorded
| Coptic | Rendering | Count | First |
|---|---|---|---|
| no glossary terms recorded | |||