Work dossier · summary and historical context
This short homily or pastoral letter, attributed to John Chrysostom, addresses a person suffering from a hemorrhage, offering spiritual consolation and moral exhortation. The text survives in Greek manuscripts of Chrysostom's corpus but is not included in the standard Clavis Patrum Graecorum, and its authenticity is questioned. Stylistic anomalies and lack of external attestation suggest a possible later attribution, though if genuine it may date to Chrysostom's Antiochene period (c. 386–397). The work is rarely cited in later Byzantine or modern scholarship and is mainly preserved in manuscript collections of Chrysostom's spuria. The edition lacks a critical apparatus and does not collate variant readings, limiting its use for textual criticism.
This work illustrates the pastoral and exegetical traditions attributed to Chrysostom, particularly the use of biblical healing narratives for spiritual consolation. Its disputed authenticity highlights the challenges of attributing texts within the vast Chrysostom corpus. The work relates to patristic exegesis of the hemorrhaging woman and to the genre of pastoral letters offering comfort in illness, connecting to broader themes of divine economy and spiritual commerce in early Christian literature.
The work is transmitted in Greek manuscripts among the spuria of John Chrysostom (c. 349–407). If authentic, it would belong to his Antiochene period (c. 386–397), when he preached and wrote pastoral letters as a presbyter in Antioch. The genre is a homily or pastoral letter, offering spiritual comfort to a person with a hemorrhage, likely drawing on the biblical story of the hemorrhaging woman healed by Christ (Matthew 9:20-22; Mark 5:25-34). The text's survival in manuscript collections of Chrysostom's works indicates it was copied and preserved within Byzantine monastic or ecclesiastical circles, but its absence from the Clavis Patrum Graecorum and rare citation in later scholarship suggest limited circulation and doubtful authenticity. The lack of a critical edition and collation of variant readings further complicates its historical placement.
Apparatus · what the pipeline recorded
| Coptic | Rendering | Count | First |
|---|---|---|---|
| no glossary terms recorded | |||