Work dossier · summary and historical context
This homily, attributed to John Chrysostom (c. 349–407 CE), is a panegyric on the apostle Thomas, celebrating his role in the early church and his missionary work. The text employs elevated rhetoric, including rhetorical questions and apostrophes, typical of Chrysostom's homiletic style. It survives in a single manuscript tradition, with the edition by khazarzar based on a collation of several witnesses, though without a critical apparatus. The homily was used in Byzantine liturgical contexts for the feast of Thomas (October 6 or the Sunday after Easter) and influenced later hagiographical accounts of Thomas's mission to India. Its exact date and place of delivery are unknown, but it likely belongs to Chrysostom's Antiochene period (c. 386–397 CE).
This homily is significant for its contribution to the hagiographical tradition of Thomas the apostle, particularly his mission to India, and for its use in Byzantine liturgy. It exemplifies Chrysostom's homiletic style and theological concerns, including anti-Arian polemic and the exaltation of apostolic authority. The text also provides insight into the development of feast-day preaching in the early church.
The homily is traditionally attributed to John Chrysostom (c. 349–407 CE), a prominent preacher and theologian of the early church, known for his eloquent homilies and exegetical works. The exact date and place of delivery are unknown, but stylistic and content analysis suggests it belongs to his Antiochene period (c. 386–397 CE), when he served as a presbyter in Antioch. The text survives in a single manuscript tradition, with the edition by khazarzar based on a collation of several witnesses, though the transmission history is not fully documented and some passages may be corrupt or interpolated. The homily was used in Byzantine liturgical contexts for the feast of Thomas (October 6 or the Sunday after Easter) and reflects the veneration of Thomas as a missionary to India, a tradition that developed in early Christian literature. The elevated register and rhetorical devices are consistent with Chrysostom's homiletic style, but the lack of a critical apparatus limits assessment of textual reliability.
Apparatus · what the pipeline recorded
| Coptic | Rendering | Count | First |
|---|---|---|---|
| no glossary terms recorded | |||