Work dossier · summary and historical context
This homily, traditionally attributed to John Chrysostom (c. 349–407) and assigned to his Antiochene period (c. 386–397), is a Paschal sermon that contrasts Jewish typology with Christian truth, using the metaphor of a painter's sketch and final colors to illustrate the progression from law to gospel. It dismisses Greek festivals as earthly and exalts Christian feasts as transcendent. The Greek text survives in medieval manuscripts, the earliest from the 10th century, and was incorporated into Byzantine Easter liturgy. The present edition (khazarzar) lacks a critical apparatus, so readers must consult the Patrologia Graeca for textual variants. The title 'In sanctum pascha sermo 5' is a later Latin rubric; Greek manuscripts often simply label it 'Εἰς τὸ πάσχα'.
This homily exemplifies Chrysostom's rhetorical skill and typological method, central to Antiochene exegesis. It shaped Byzantine Easter liturgy and influenced later Paschal sermon cycles. Its anti-Jewish and anti-pagan arguments illuminate fourth-century Christian identity formation. The work's uncertain dating and manuscript tradition caution against overconfident attribution, but its liturgical persistence underscores its importance.
The homily is traditionally placed in Antioch, Syria, during Chrysostom's presbyterate (c. 386–397), a period of intense Christian self-definition against both Jewish and pagan traditions. The fourth century saw the rise of great preachers like Chrysostom, who used typological exegesis to assert Christian supersession of Judaism. The sermon's anti-Jewish polemic reflects contemporary tensions, as Christian communities sought to distinguish themselves from Jewish practices. The text survives in multiple medieval Greek manuscripts, the earliest from the 10th century, indicating its enduring liturgical use. It was transmitted through Byzantine homiliaries and later Slavonic translations, becoming a standard Paschal reading. The lack of a critical edition in the present source means the manuscript base and textual history remain uncertain, though the Patrologia Graeca provides a more authoritative version.
Apparatus · what the pipeline recorded
| Coptic | Rendering | Count | First |
|---|---|---|---|
| no glossary terms recorded | |||