Work dossier · summary and historical context
The homily 'In sanctam Pelagiam' is traditionally attributed to John Chrysostom but survives only in a single 10th-century Greek manuscript, with no earlier witnesses or patristic citations. It is absent from the standard Clavis Patrum Graecorum and Byzantine liturgical menologia, indicating limited circulation and likely non-liturgical use. The text employs common hagiographic tropes, such as athletic metaphors for martyrdom and animal symbolism (dove and serpent), paralleling Chrysostom's other encomia. The source edition lacks critical apparatus, leaving textual cruces unresolved. The homily's authenticity and date remain uncertain, with scholarly caution advised regarding its attribution and provenance.
The homily contributes to the study of hagiographic literature and the cult of female martyrs in late antique and medieval Christianity. Its uncertain attribution highlights the challenges of pseudepigraphy in the Chrysostomic corpus. The text's use of animal symbolism and athletic metaphors reflects common encomiastic conventions, offering insights into the rhetorical strategies of early Christian martyr narratives. Its limited transmission underscores the selective preservation of homiletic works.
The homily is preserved in a single medieval manuscript tradition, the earliest witness being a 10th-century Greek codex. No earlier papyrus or patristic citation exists, and the work is absent from the standard CPG, suggesting it may be a later composition rather than an authentic work of John Chrysostom (c. 347–407). The text is not included in Byzantine liturgical menologia, indicating it never achieved widespread liturgical use. Its limited manuscript circulation points to a narrow readership, possibly within a monastic or local cult context. The source edition (khazarzar) provides no critical apparatus or manuscript sigla, obscuring variant readings and scribal corrections. The homily's genre as an encomium on a female martyr aligns with Chrysostom's known hagiographic works, but the lack of external attestation and the late manuscript witness raise doubts about its authenticity. The date of composition cannot be determined with certainty; it may be a product of the 5th–10th centuries, possibly composed in a Greek-speaking Christian community in the Eastern Mediterranean.
Apparatus · what the pipeline recorded
| Coptic | Rendering | Count | First |
|---|---|---|---|
| no glossary terms recorded | |||