Work dossier · summary and historical context
This work is a homily on Isaiah 45:7 attributed to John Chrysostom, preserved in Greek manuscript tradition. Its authenticity is debated due to stylistic and doctrinal variations, and it is not listed in the standard Clavis Patrum Graecorum. The text likely dates to Chrysostom's Antiochene period (c. 386–397) if authentic, but the sole manuscript source (10th–12th centuries) lacks critical apparatus. The homily shows limited circulation, absent from later Byzantine catenae or liturgical readings. A modern English translation exists without attribution or notes, unsuitable for critical analysis without verification against the Greek. The attribution remains provisional pending full manuscript collation.
This homily, if authentic, would provide insight into Chrysostom's exegesis of Isaiah and his rhetorical strategies in Antiochene sermons. However, its disputed authorship and limited transmission highlight challenges in patristic attribution. The work relates to debates over Chrysostom's corpus and the need for critical editions. Its study underscores the importance of manuscript collation and caution in using digital texts for historical analysis.
The homily is attributed to John Chrysostom (c. 347–407), a prominent Greek Church Father known for his exegetical and moral sermons. If authentic, it would belong to his Antiochene period (c. 386–397), when he served as a presbyter in Antioch, delivering homilies on Old Testament books like Isaiah. The text's genre is a homily, a common form for Chrysostom, often delivered in liturgical settings. The Greek manuscript tradition preserves the work, but its absence from the Clavis Patrum Graecorum and limited citation in later sources suggest it may be spurious or of marginal circulation. The single manuscript source (10th–12th centuries) indicates possible later copying, but without critical edition, textual variants and scribal interventions are unexamined. The work's title echoes a known spurious homily on Isaiah, raising further doubts. Its inclusion in modern digital collections reflects antiquarian interest rather than continuous tradition.
Apparatus · what the pipeline recorded
| Coptic | Rendering | Count | First |
|---|---|---|---|
| no glossary terms recorded | |||