Work dossier · summary and historical context
This homily on the Ascension, traditionally attributed to John Chrysostom (c. 349–407), presents a triadic structure of three paradoxical wonders—the birth from an unwed mother, the three-day resurrection, and the fleshly ascension—as an unbreakable rope. It alludes to Acts 1:10-11, contrasts Elijah's translation with Christ's ascension, and uses the term 'hypostasis' to affirm the permanence of the incarnate form. The homily was likely delivered in Antioch or Constantinople and later incorporated into Byzantine liturgical cycles for the feast of the Ascension. The digital edition by khazarzar lacks critical apparatus, and the attribution to Chrysostom is disputed by some scholars.
This homily matters as a witness to early Byzantine liturgical preaching on the Ascension, illustrating how patristic authors wove scriptural allusions and rhetorical tropes to articulate Christological doctrines. It relates to broader debates about the authenticity of Chrysostom's corpus and the transmission of homiletic texts in manuscript traditions. The triadic structure and use of 'hypostasis' reflect key theological concerns of the 4th–5th centuries.
The homily is traditionally dated to the late 4th or early 5th century, during John Chrysostom's tenure as a presbyter in Antioch (c. 386–397) or as Archbishop of Constantinople (398–407). It was composed in Greek for a Christian community in the Eastern Roman Empire, likely for the feast of the Ascension, forty days after Easter. The text survives in multiple Byzantine manuscripts, indicating its use in liturgical cycles, but the khazarzar edition is a digital transcription without manuscript sigla or stemmatic analysis. The homily's genre is a festal homily, a common form in patristic preaching. Its relation to other Christian literature includes echoes of Acts 1:10-11 and contrasts with Old Testament accounts like 2 Kings 2:11. The authenticity of the attribution to Chrysostom is questioned due to stylistic or doctrinal inconsistencies, though it remains traditional.
Apparatus · what the pipeline recorded
| Coptic | Rendering | Count | First |
|---|---|---|---|
| no glossary terms recorded | |||