Work dossier · summary and historical context
De studio praesentium is a Greek treatise attributed to John Chrysostom, surviving in a single manuscript tradition with no early independent witnesses. Its attribution rests on stylistic criteria and later ascription, but no external evidence securely dates it. The work is generally assigned to Chrysostom's Antiochene period (c. 386–397) based on thematic parallels with his homilies on the statues, though this remains conjectural. The title is a modern Latin rendering; the original Greek heading is uncertain, and the work may be a fragment or excerpt from a longer homily. It is not cited in Byzantine florilegia or catenae, appears in no early Latin translation, and exercised no detectable influence on later literature.
De studio praesentium is significant as a potential witness to Chrysostom's Antiochene moral teaching, particularly his emphasis on constant hearing as a means of purifying conscience. Its uncertain attribution and fragmentary survival highlight the challenges of reconstructing the Chrysostomic corpus. The work's thematic parallels with his homilies on the statues offer a possible context, but its lack of external attestation limits its value for historical reconstruction.
The work is tentatively placed in late 4th-century Antioch, where Chrysostom served as a presbyter and preacher (c. 386–397). The community was a major Christian center with a vibrant liturgical and ascetic life, and Chrysostom's homilies often addressed moral reform and scriptural engagement. The treatise's emphasis on zeal (σπουδή) versus indolence (ῥᾳθυμία) reflects a common Chrysostomic binary, and its metaphor of an 'unconsumable treasure' for scriptural knowledge echoes Stoic and Cynic commonplaces. The claim that women face no natural impediment in virtue's 'courses' likely alludes to Galatians 3:28 and Chrysostom's own homilies on women's moral capacity. The work's survival in a single manuscript tradition, with no early papyri or catena citations, suggests limited circulation. Its lack of influence on later monastic or ascetic literature further indicates a narrow transmission, possibly as a fragment or excerpt. The present edition (khazarzar) lacks a critical apparatus or stemma, and the Greek text has not been collated against all extant witnesses.
Apparatus · what the pipeline recorded
| Coptic | Rendering | Count | First |
|---|---|---|---|
| no glossary terms recorded | |||