Work dossier · summary and historical context
De consubstantiali is a Greek treatise attributed to John Chrysostom (c. 349–407) that argues for the consubstantiality of the Son with the Father through scriptural exegesis and anti-Arian polemic. Its homiletic and doctrinal register suggests a catechetical context, likely from Chrysostom's Antiochene period (c. 386–397). The text survives in a single manuscript tradition, with lacunae, and the modern edition by khazarzar relies on a 17th-century copy that may contain scribal errors or interpolations. It was cited in later Byzantine florilegia and used in conciliar debates on the Trinity, particularly at the Second Council of Nicaea (787), but its influence waned after the Photian schism.
De consubstantiali is significant as a witness to Chrysostom's anti-Arian polemic and his exegetical method, reflecting the theological debates of the 4th century. Its use in later Byzantine florilegia and conciliar debates, especially at the Second Council of Nicaea (787), underscores its role in Trinitarian orthodoxy. The work also illustrates the transmission and reception of Chrysostom's writings in later centuries.
The treatise is attributed to John Chrysostom, a prominent Antiochene preacher and later Archbishop of Constantinople (c. 349–407). Its exact dating is uncertain, but its exegetical method and theological concerns align with Chrysostom's Antiochene period (c. 386–397), when he was a presbyter in Antioch. The work engages with Arian subordinationism, a central controversy of the 4th century, and defends the Nicene Creed's homoousios. The text survives in a single manuscript tradition, with lacunae, and the edition by khazarzar relies on a 17th-century copy, which may contain scribal errors or interpolations. It was cited in later Byzantine florilegia and used in conciliar debates on the Trinity, particularly during the Second Council of Nicaea (787). Its influence waned after the Photian schism (9th–10th centuries). The lack of a critical apparatus limits its use for textual criticism.
Apparatus · what the pipeline recorded
| Coptic | Rendering | Count | First |
|---|---|---|---|
| no glossary terms recorded | |||