Work dossier · summary and historical context
De beato Philogonio is a homily by John Chrysostom praising Philogonius, a bishop of Antioch who died around 323 and opposed Arianism. Delivered likely in Antioch during Chrysostom’s presbyterate (late 380s–early 390s), the work employs epideictic and parenetic rhetoric, with apostrophes and rhetorical questions typical of his Antiochene style. The Greek text survives in a single medieval manuscript tradition; the modern khazarzar edition is a digital transcription without critical apparatus, limiting textual verification. The homily is not included in the standard Byzantine menologion for Philogonius’ feast (20 December), suggesting limited liturgical use despite its patristic authority.
This homily provides insight into Chrysostom’s rhetoric and his veneration of a pre-Nicene anti-Arian bishop, reflecting late 4th-century Antiochene piety and theological memory. It relates to Chrysostom’s other festal homilies and to the development of hagiographical literature, though its limited liturgical reception suggests it was not widely used in Byzantine worship.
The homily was likely delivered in Antioch in the late 380s or early 390s, during Chrysostom’s presbyterate, though the exact date is not securely attested. Philogonius died ca. 323 and was bishop of Antioch from 319/320, known for opposing Arianism. The work’s register is epideictic and parenetic, with frequent apostrophe and rhetorical questions, characteristic of Chrysostom’s pulpit style. The Greek text survives in a single medieval manuscript tradition; the khazarzar edition is a modern digital transcription without critical apparatus, so its readings may not reflect the earliest recoverable form. The homily is not included in the standard Byzantine liturgical menologion for Philogonius’ feast (20 December), suggesting limited liturgical use despite its patristic authority. The khazarzar edition provides no manuscript siglum, collation, or textual notes, preventing verification of editorial decisions or reconstruction of the source manuscript’s readings.
Apparatus · what the pipeline recorded
| Coptic | Rendering | Count | First |
|---|---|---|---|
| no glossary terms recorded | |||