Work dossier · summary and historical context
This homily by John Chrysostom is a catechetical instruction on the sinfulness of swearing oaths, delivered in a direct, hortatory register typical of his paraenetic style. Chrysostom argues that even truthful oaths (εὐορκεῖν) entail punishment, a distinctive ascetic position. The text survives in a single manuscript tradition via the digital compilation 'khazarzar', whose relationship to critical editions by Montfaucon or Migne is unverified. The homily likely belongs to Chrysostom's presbyterate in Antioch (386–397 CE), though no external evidence fixes its exact year. Its anti-oath teaching was cited in later Byzantine canonical collections as patristic authority against swearing.
This homily exemplifies Chrysostom's distinctive ascetic position that even truthful oaths are sinful, a teaching that influenced later Byzantine canonical tradition. It also illustrates his homiletic techniques, such as the rhetorical use of 'I conjecture' (στοχάζομαι) to engage the congregation. The work relates to Chrysostom's broader catechetical corpus and to patristic teachings on oath-taking, which were codified in Byzantine canon law.
The homily was likely delivered in Antioch during Chrysostom's presbyterate (386–397 CE), a period when he produced many catechetical homilies for baptismal preparation and moral instruction. Antioch was a major center of Antiochene exegesis and ascetic practice, and Chrysostom's rhetoric reflects the city's vibrant liturgical life. The text survives in a single manuscript tradition via the digital compilation 'khazarzar', which does not provide an apparatus for textual variants or indicate collation against principal manuscripts used by modern editors. Its relationship to the critical editions of Montfaucon (18th c.) or Migne (19th c.) is unverified. The homily's anti-oath teaching was later cited in Byzantine canonical collections, such as the Syntagma of Matthew Blastares (14th c.), as patristic authority against swearing. The superscription identifies this as the second discourse (Λόγος βʹ) in a series on oaths, following a previous catechesis on the same subject, which may be lost or refer to the immediately preceding discourse.
Apparatus · what the pipeline recorded
| Coptic | Rendering | Count | First |
|---|---|---|---|
| no glossary terms recorded | |||