Work dossier · summary and historical context
John Chrysostom's treatise 'Ascetam facetiis uti non debere' argues that monks must avoid jesting (facetiae) as incompatible with ascetic discipline. Drawing on scriptural and patristic authority, Chrysostom frames humor as a distraction from spiritual vigilance, targeting the Greek concept of εὐτραπελία (jesting) as a vice that undermines monastic dignity. The work likely dates to Chrysostom's Antiochene presbyterate (c. 386–397), a period when he produced many ascetic homilies. It survives in a single Greek manuscript tradition, with the khazarzar edition relying on Migne's PG 48 and earlier printed editions. No critical edition exists, and the text lacks apparatus for textual variants or liturgical context.
This treatise is significant for its focused critique of humor in early Christian monasticism, contributing to broader patristic discussions on speech ethics and spiritual discipline. It relates to Chrysostom's other ascetic works and contemporary monastic rules, such as those of Basil of Caesarea, which also regulate laughter and jesting. The work's survival in a single manuscript tradition highlights challenges in textual transmission and the need for critical editions.
The treatise was likely composed during John Chrysostom's tenure as a presbyter in Antioch (c. 386–397), a period when he wrote extensively on asceticism and monastic discipline. Antioch was a major center of early Christian asceticism, with diverse monastic communities debating proper conduct, including speech and demeanor. Chrysostom's work reflects these contemporary debates, arguing against jesting as a threat to spiritual vigilance. The text survives in a single Greek manuscript tradition, transmitted through the Benedictine edition of Chrysostom's works (1834–1840) and later cited in Eastern Orthodox ascetic florilegia. The khazarzar edition, based on Migne's PG 48, provides no apparatus for textual variants or marginalia, limiting assessment of scribal interventions or original liturgical context. The work was never formally canonized but remains influential in ascetic literature.
Apparatus · what the pipeline recorded
| Coptic | Rendering | Count | First |
|---|---|---|---|
| no glossary terms recorded | |||