Work dossier · summary and historical context
This homily in honor of Saint Anthony the Great survives in a single medieval manuscript (Athos, Vatopedi 408, 12th–13th c.) and is traditionally attributed to Hesychius of Jerusalem (d. after 433), though the attribution is unconfirmed. The text is not part of the standard Greek liturgical menologia for Anthony (Jan. 17) and appears to have been used only in monastic reading circles. The source edition (khazarzar) lacks critical apparatus, so variant readings and scribal corrections are unrecorded. The homily employs encomiastic conventions—anaphora, athletic metaphors, and rhetorical modesty—and alludes to scriptural passages (John 13:23, 1 Cor. 15:31, Heb. 11:32) to frame Anthony’s asceticism as apostolic and heroic.
The homily is significant as a rare witness to the reception of Anthony’s cult in a homiletic form outside the standard liturgical tradition. Its survival in a single manuscript highlights the fragility of such texts and the importance of monastic libraries for preserving non-canonical works. The attribution to Hesychius, if correct, would add a notable homilist to the dossier of Anthony’s early admirers, but the uncertainty cautions against overinterpretation. The work enriches our understanding of how ascetic ideals were celebrated in late antique and medieval Christian communities.
The homily’s date is unknown; the sole manuscript is 12th–13th century, but the text may be earlier. The traditional attribution to Hesychius of Jerusalem (5th c.) is plausible but unverified: Hesychius was a presbyter and homilist active in Jerusalem, known for festal sermons and exegetical works, but this homily does not appear in his standard corpus. The work’s limited transmission—only one Athonite manuscript—suggests it circulated in monastic circles, perhaps on Mount Athos or in Palestinian or Syrian communities where Anthony’s cult was strong. The genre (encomiastic homily) and style (scriptural allusions, athletic imagery) align with late antique and early Byzantine hagiographical rhetoric. Without a critical edition, the text’s relationship to other Anthony literature (e.g., Athanasius’s Vita Antonii) remains unclear, though thematic parallels are evident.
Apparatus · what the pipeline recorded
| Coptic | Rendering | Count | First |
|---|---|---|---|
| no glossary terms recorded | |||