Work dossier · summary and historical context
This homily, attributed to Gregory of Nyssa (c. 335–c. 395), interprets the biblical phrase 'Hic est filius meus dilectus' (This is my beloved son). It engages with the Arian controversy, arguing against doctrinal hair-splitting and emphasizing true faith (πίστις) over technical analysis (τεχνολογοῦμεν). Gregory employs standard epithets for the devil and appeals to tradition ('as our fathers handed down') to counter Arian innovation. The homily survives in multiple Greek manuscripts but lacks a critical edition; its liturgical use was limited. The English translation occasionally paraphrases, so comparison with the Greek is advised for precise argumentation.
This homily matters as a witness to late 4th-century Trinitarian theology and homiletic practice. It illustrates Gregory's rhetorical strategies against Arianism, including appeals to tradition and critiques of doctrinal hair-splitting. The work relates to the broader Cappadocian corpus and was later cited in conciliar debates, underscoring its role in shaping orthodox Christology.
The homily is set in the late 4th century, during the Arian controversy that divided the Christian East. Gregory of Nyssa, a Cappadocian Father, wrote in Greek for a community engaged in Trinitarian debates. The work's genre is a homily, likely delivered in a liturgical setting, though it was not included in major Byzantine lectionaries, suggesting limited liturgical use. The text survives in multiple manuscripts, but the source edition (khazarzar) is a digital compilation without critical apparatus, obscuring its stemmatic basis. The homily reflects Gregory's anti-Arian polemic, echoing themes from his other works and those of Basil of Caesarea and Gregory of Nazianzus. Its transmission is uncertain, with no manuscript sigla or collation data available.
Apparatus · what the pipeline recorded
| Coptic | Rendering | Count | First |
|---|---|---|---|
| no glossary terms recorded | |||