Work dossier · summary and historical context
This homily on the Annunciation, attributed to Gregory of Nyssa, blends exegesis of Luke 1:26–38 with theological reflection on Mary as Theotokos. It contrasts Eve's disobedience with Mary's fruitfulness, employs Pauline typology of Christ as the new Adam, and describes Mary as a 'golden altar of incense' and a gate facing east. The text survives in multiple Greek manuscripts and was used in Byzantine liturgical traditions for the feast of the Annunciation (March 25), influencing later Marian theology. However, its attribution to Gregory of Nyssa is contested; stylistic and theological differences from his undisputed works suggest it may be a later composition, possibly from the 6th or 7th century. The Khazarzar edition lacks critical apparatus, hindering verification of the text's stemma.
This homily is significant for the development of Marian theology and Byzantine liturgical tradition. It exemplifies the typological contrast between Eve and Mary, a theme that became central to later Mariology. The text's disputed authorship highlights the challenges of attributing works in the patristic corpus and the need for careful source criticism. Its use in the Annunciation feast underscores its role in shaping popular devotion and liturgical practice.
The homily is set within the Greek-speaking Christian world, likely originating in the Eastern Roman (Byzantine) Empire. If genuine, it dates to the late 4th century, when Gregory of Nyssa (c. 335–c. 395) was active in Cappadocia, a region in Asia Minor. Gregory was a key figure in the Cappadocian Fathers, known for his theological works on the Trinity and asceticism. The homily's Marian focus reflects the growing devotion to Mary in the post-Nicene period, particularly after the Council of Ephesus (431) affirmed her title Theotokos. If spurious, the text may date to the 6th or 7th century, a time when Marian feasts like the Annunciation became established in Byzantine liturgy. The homily's transmission through multiple Greek manuscripts suggests it was copied for liturgical use, but no external witness confirms the earlier date. The Khazarzar edition provides no manuscript sigla or critical apparatus, making it impossible to trace the text's stemma or variant readings.
Apparatus · what the pipeline recorded
| Coptic | Rendering | Count | First |
|---|---|---|---|
| no glossary terms recorded | |||