Work dossier · summary and historical context
This short, aphoristic text attributed to Evagrius Ponticus (c. 345–399) discusses the divine name, focusing on the Tetragrammaton (YHWH) and its Hebrew equivalents such as Adonai. Written in a directive, spiritual register for monastic readers, it reflects early Christian interest in Hebrew names and the unpronounceable nature of the divine name. The work survives in Greek manuscripts of the Evagrian corpus, but its attribution is traditional and not securely established by external evidence. The Khazarzar edition is a digital transcription without critical apparatus, limiting verification of textual variants. The text likely dates from the late 4th to early 5th century.
This text is significant for its early Christian reflection on the Tetragrammaton and Hebrew divine names, showing how Greek-speaking monks engaged with Jewish traditions. It provides insight into the transmission of Hebrew linguistic knowledge in Christian monastic circles and the development of apophatic theology. The work relates to Evagrius's broader corpus on prayer and contemplation, as well as to patristic discussions of the divine name in Origen and later writers.
The work belongs to the ascetic tradition of late antique Christianity, likely composed in a monastic community in the Greek-speaking Eastern Mediterranean, possibly in Egypt or Palestine, where Evagrius spent his later years. Evagrius Ponticus was a prominent theologian and monk, known for his integration of Origenist thought with practical asceticism. The text's focus on the Tetragrammaton and Hebrew divine names indicates engagement with Jewish exegetical traditions, possibly through Origen's Hexapla or contemporary Christian interest in the divine name. The manuscript transmission is unclear; the work survives in Greek codices of the Evagrian corpus, but its exact place in the tradition is uncertain. The Khazarzar edition provides no apparatus criticus, translation, or commentary, so readers cannot assess the reliability of the transcription against the manuscript base. The text's genre is other, likely a short treatise or note on the divine name, not a systematic theological work.
Apparatus · what the pipeline recorded
| Coptic | Rendering | Count | First |
|---|---|---|---|
| no glossary terms recorded | |||