Work dossier · summary and historical context
Eustathius of Antioch's 'De anima contra Arianos' is a polemical treatise defending the full humanity of Christ against Arian subordinationism, likely composed between 325 and 330. The work argues for the material reality of Christ's soul, using scriptural exegesis and syllogistic reasoning. It survives in a single 10th-century manuscript (Paris. gr. 1115) with lacunae, and in fragments cited by Theodoret of Cyrus and John of Damascus. The text is structured as a forensic argument, contrasting Christ's human development (Bethlehem, Egypt, Nazareth) with his divine power, and employing the resurrection of Lazarus as evidence of embodied power. The present edition is a digital transcription of Migne's 19th-century reprint, lacking critical apparatus.
This treatise is a key witness to early anti-Arian polemic, particularly in its defense of Christ's full humanity and the material reality of his soul. It influenced later Christological debates, as evidenced by its citation in Theodoret and John of Damascus. The work's focus on the soul's materiality and Christ's embodied power offers a distinct perspective within the Arian controversy, complementing Athanasius's more metaphysical approach. Its fragmentary survival underscores the challenges of reconstructing early Christian theological diversity.
Eustathius of Antioch (ca. 300–337) wrote this work during the Arian controversy, likely between 325 and 330, based on internal references to the Council of Nicaea (325) and the absence of later Athanasian developments. The treatise was composed in Greek within the Antiochene theological tradition, which emphasized the historical humanity of Christ. It was transmitted through a single 10th-century manuscript (Paris. gr. 1115) and fragments in later florilegia, including Theodoret of Cyrus's 'Eranistes' (5th century) and John of Damascus's 'Sacra Parallela' (8th century). The work's survival is fragmentary, and no modern critical edition exists. The present text is a digital transcription of the 19th-century Migne reprint (PG 18.2), which does not collate the Paris manuscript or correct misreadings. The genre is polemic/apologetic, employing forensic rhetoric and exegetical argument against Arian subordinationism.
Apparatus · what the pipeline recorded
| Coptic | Rendering | Count | First |
|---|---|---|---|
| no glossary terms recorded | |||