Work dossier · summary and historical context
Sermo 15, attributed to Basil of Caesarea, is a Greek homily on monastic conduct preserved in multiple manuscript families with significant variants in its doxologies, indicating liturgical adaptation. The work's date is uncertain, but internal references to the Arian controversy suggest a range of 360–370 CE, though no external witness confirms this. The khazarzar edition lacks a critical apparatus and does not record variant readings from early manuscripts such as Vat. gr. 443. The attribution to Basil is contested due to stylistic divergences from his undisputed works, particularly in rhetorical figures. The text was excerpted in the Philokalia and later used in Byzantine monastic lectionaries for the feast of the Holy Fathers.
Sermo 15 is significant for its contested attribution to Basil, which highlights the challenges of authenticating works in the patristic corpus. Its use in the Philokalia and Byzantine lectionaries demonstrates its enduring influence on Eastern monastic spirituality. The homily's engagement with the Arian controversy and its stylistic features offer insights into 4th-century theological and rhetorical practices.
Sermo 15 is a homily in Greek, likely composed in the late 4th century, possibly in Cappadocia, where Basil was active as bishop of Caesarea. The work's uncertain dating and contested attribution reflect the fluidity of the Basilian corpus. The homily's engagement with the Arian controversy places it within the theological debates of the 360s–370s, a period when Basil was defending Nicene orthodoxy. The text's transmission through multiple manuscript families, with variant doxologies, suggests it was adapted for liturgical use in different monastic communities. Its inclusion in the Philokalia and Byzantine lectionaries for the feast of the Holy Fathers indicates its later reception in Eastern monastic and liturgical traditions. The khazarzar edition, based on 17th-century printed editions, does not provide a critical apparatus, limiting its utility for textual criticism.
Apparatus · what the pipeline recorded
| Coptic | Rendering | Count | First |
|---|---|---|---|
| no glossary terms recorded | |||