Work dossier · summary and historical context
The Sermo exhortatorius is a Greek homily traditionally attributed to Athanasius of Alexandria, though its authorship remains contested. Surviving in a single 10th-century manuscript, it likely dates to the 4th or 5th century and reflects Alexandrian ascetic theology. The text exhorts its audience to faith, truth, and purity, drawing on catechetical topoi and apocryphal traditions. It prescribes fasting on Wednesdays and Fridays, a practice common in early monasticism, and includes unusual ascetic remarks about women. The homily circulated in Byzantine monastic anthologies like the Philokalia but never entered the standard liturgical cycle. Its limited readership was confined to ascetic circles, and the khazarzar edition lacks critical apparatus, necessitating caution in scholarly use.
The Sermo exhortatorius is significant as a witness to early Christian paraenesis and ascetic practice, particularly the triadic demand of faith, truth, and purity and the prescription of Wednesday and Friday fasting. Its use of apocryphal traditions (e.g., eye-gouging reference) and unusual remarks on women's fasting offer insights into marginal ascetic currents. The contested authorship highlights the challenges of attributing late antique homilies, while its limited transmission underscores the selective preservation of monastic literature.
The Sermo exhortatorius is situated within the 4th- to 5th-century Alexandrian Christian tradition, a period marked by intense theological debate (e.g., Arian controversy) and the flourishing of monasticism. Alexandria was a major center of Greek patristic literature, and Athanasius (c. 296–373) was a key figure in Nicene orthodoxy. The homily's ascetic focus aligns with the desert fathers and early monastic rules, though its attribution to Athanasius is uncertain due to the lack of external witnesses before the 9th century. The text survives in a single 10th-century Greek manuscript, suggesting limited transmission within Byzantine monastic libraries. Its inclusion in the Philokalia indicates later use among hesychast and ascetic communities, but it never became part of the Eastern Church's liturgical cycle. The khazarzar edition provides no critical apparatus, leaving textual decisions and lacunae unaddressed.
Apparatus · what the pipeline recorded
| Coptic | Rendering | Count | First |
|---|---|---|---|
| no glossary terms recorded | |||