Work dossier · summary and historical context
The Sermo de descriptione deiparae is a Greek homily traditionally attributed to Athanasius of Alexandria, though its authorship remains uncertain. Surviving in a single manuscript tradition, the text was used in Byzantine liturgical contexts for feasts of the Theotokos, especially the Dormition, and influenced later Marian hymnography. The homily employs apophatic language and adapts scriptural passages, such as Luke 2:1, for theological reflection. The source edition by khazarzar is a digital transcription of a printed edition without critical apparatus, limiting its use for textual criticism. The work's theology and style are consistent with late fourth-century Alexandrian preaching, but no external witness before the ninth century confirms Athanasian authorship.
The homily is significant for its role in the development of Marian theology and liturgy in the Byzantine tradition. It exemplifies the use of apophatic language and scriptural adaptation in late antique preaching, and its influence on later hymnography underscores its lasting impact. The uncertain attribution highlights the challenges of pseudepigraphy in patristic literature.
The homily is undated, but its theology and style align with late fourth-century Alexandrian preaching, a period when Marian devotion was developing in the Greek-speaking East. The text survives in a single Greek manuscript tradition, with no external witness before the ninth century, making its attribution to Athanasius uncertain. It was used in Byzantine liturgical contexts for feasts of the Theotokos, particularly the Dormition, indicating its integration into the liturgical life of the Byzantine Church. The homily's transmission likely occurred through monastic or ecclesiastical networks that preserved and adapted patristic homilies for liturgical use. The lack of a critical edition and collation of manuscripts means that variant readings and scribal corrections are not recorded, limiting its use for textual criticism. The work's influence on later Marian hymnography suggests it was valued for its theological content and rhetorical style.
Apparatus · what the pipeline recorded
| Coptic | Rendering | Count | First |
|---|---|---|---|
| no glossary terms recorded | |||