Work dossier · summary and historical context
The Sermo contra Latinos, attributed to Athanasius of Alexandria, is a Greek homily that argues against the Latin addition of the Filioque to the Niceno-Constantinopolitan Creed, asserting that the Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father alone. The text survives in a single manuscript tradition of late medieval copies, with no early Latin version. Its attribution to Athanasius (c. 296–373) is contested, as its anti-Latin polemic aligns more closely with later Byzantine controversies, likely from the 5th–9th centuries. The homily was used in Byzantine florilegia during the Photian and Hesychast debates but never entered the standard Athanasian corpus. The edition by khazarzar lacks a critical apparatus and does not collate manuscript witnesses beyond the base text.
The Sermo contra Latinos is significant as a key text in the Byzantine anti-Latin polemical tradition, illustrating the theological arguments used to defend the Greek position on the Filioque. It reflects the intensification of East-West theological disputes after the Council of Florence and was employed in later controversies, such as the Photian and Hesychast debates. The work also highlights the contested attribution of texts to Athanasius, demonstrating how later authors used his authority to bolster their arguments.
The Sermo contra Latinos is a Greek homily of uncertain date, likely composed between the 5th and 9th centuries, during the post-Chalcedonian period when theological disputes between Eastern and Western Christianity intensified. The text reflects the Filioque controversy, which centered on whether the Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father alone (Greek position) or from the Father and the Son (Latin position). The homily uses patristic authority and a composite citation of John 15:26 to argue for the Father as sole source of the Spirit, distinguishing between the Spirit's 'procession' (ἐκπόρευσις) as existence and its 'outpouring' (πρόχυσιν) of gifts, which may involve the Son. The work survives in a single manuscript tradition of late medieval copies, with no early Latin version, and was used in Byzantine anti-Latin florilegia during the Photian (9th century) and Hesychast (14th century) controversies. Its attribution to Athanasius is contested, as the polemic fits a later context, possibly after the Council of Florence (1439). The edition by khazarzar relies on a collation of late medieval copies but does not provide a critical apparatus or collate manuscript witnesses beyond the base text.
Apparatus · what the pipeline recorded
| Coptic | Rendering | Count | First |
|---|---|---|---|
| no glossary terms recorded | |||