Work dossier · summary and historical context
The Petitiones Arianorum is a Greek anti-Arian work attributed to Athanasius of Alexandria, likely composed during his mid-4th-century exiles. It survives only in Greek, transmitted among Athanasius’ polemical writings, and is preserved in a single medieval witness (the khazarzar edition provides no critical apparatus). The text consists of two petitions (πρώτη and δευτέρα ἐντυχία) addressed to the emperor, probably Constantius II, and depicts Arian clergy making subordinationist claims. It was used by pro-Nicene polemicists to illustrate Arian theology but was not cited in ecumenical councils. The work’s precise date is uncertain, but internal references to exiles and imperial audiences place it in the mid-4th century.
The Petitiones Arianorum is significant as a rare example of a formal Arian petition preserved within a Nicene polemical framework. It provides insight into the rhetorical strategies and theological claims of Arian clergy during the mid-4th century, as well as the administrative procedures for addressing the emperor. The work also illustrates how Athanasius and later pro-Nicene writers used such documents to discredit Arianism, making it a valuable source for understanding the transmission and reception of anti-Arian polemic.
The Petitiones Arianorum belongs to the mid-4th century, during the Arian controversy that followed the Council of Nicaea (325 CE). Athanasius, the Nicene bishop of Alexandria, was repeatedly exiled by emperors favoring Arian or Homoian theology, including Constantine and Constantius II. The work is a formal supplication (ἐντυχία) to the emperor, a standard late Roman administrative procedure. The setting is likely Antioch, and the text reflects the intense theological and political conflicts between Nicene and Arian factions. It survives only in Greek, transmitted among Athanasius’ anti-Arian corpus, and was used in patristic florilegia to document Arian subordinationism. The khazarzar edition does not specify its manuscript basis, but the text likely derives from a single medieval witness, limiting our ability to assess textual variants. The work’s authenticity as Athanasian is generally accepted, though its precise date and original context remain uncertain.
Apparatus · what the pipeline recorded
| Coptic | Rendering | Count | First |
|---|---|---|---|
| no glossary terms recorded | |||