machine-draft · no human review2 passages · 366 words
Work dossier · summary and historical context
Summary
The 'Homilia de passione et cruce domini' is a Greek homily traditionally attributed to Athanasius the Great of Alexandria, surviving in a single medieval manuscript. Its theology and style align with 4th-century Alexandrian preaching, but the attribution is unconfirmed before the 9th century. The homily reflects Christological controversies, particularly anti-Arian polemic, and emphasizes the cosmic significance of the crucifixion. It was not widely circulated in later Greek Christian tradition and lacks citation in patristic florilegia or Byzantine liturgical sources. The edition provides no critical apparatus, limiting assessment of textual transmission.
This homily provides insight into 4th-century Alexandrian Christology and anti-Arian rhetoric, even if its attribution to Athanasius remains uncertain. It illustrates how passion narratives were used to argue for Christ's divinity. Its limited transmission highlights the fragility of patristic texts and the importance of manuscript evidence for reconstructing early Christian theology.
Historical context
The homily is attributed to Athanasius of Alexandria (c. 296–373), a key figure in the Arian controversy. If authentic, it would date to the 4th century, likely composed in Alexandria for a Greek-speaking Christian community. The text engages with Arian denial of Christ's full divinity, asserting the Logos as uncreated and co-eternal with God. Its sole witness is a medieval manuscript, suggesting limited circulation; it is not cited in known patristic collections or Byzantine liturgy. The homily's genre is a homily on the passion, blending exegesis, typology, and polemic. Its survival depends entirely on this single copy, with no independent textual tradition to verify the attribution or detect scribal alterations.
background — historical or institutional context the text presupposes
term — a Coptic word and the rendering chosen for it
structure — the passage's function in the work
reception — later use — liturgy, canon law, daughter versions
caution — uncertainty or a contested reading
sense — what the passage says
parallel — a parallel in another text or tradition
Pipeline notes
coverageNo English translation could be identified: a language model asked twice could not name one, though it could not rule one out either. That is not proof that none exists — translations in dissertations, recent books and other modern languages are easily missed.
limitThe English is a machine draft produced passage by passage from the transcribed Coptic; no human has verified it. The commentary is model-written and cites only keys the pipeline could resolve.
registerRegister: homily in ancient Greek; the English keeps the liturgical formulae and the vocatives rather than normalising them.
structurePassages: 2 narrative.
sourceSource edition: khazarzar — Migne PG text (public domain); khazarzar host and the digitising project state no licence for this layer
Athanasius on the Passion.
"Death reigned from Adam until Moses." But when it dared against the Lord, it sees itself cast out of the whole, and trampled underfoot by all, and crushed beneath our feet. And what is great and astonishing, even while the Lord was hanging on the cross (for the body was His, and the Word was in it), the sun was darkened, the earth trembled, the rocks were split, the veil of the temple was rent, and many bodies of those who had fallen asleep arose. And no one, as the Arians now dare, debated whether one ought to obey the Word made flesh; but even seeing a man, they recognized Him as their Creator; and hearing a human voice, they did not say because of the human that the Word is a creature; but rather they trembled, and knew no less that He spoke from a holy temple. For creation does not worship a creature; nor again, because of the flesh, did it refuse to worship its own Lord, but it saw its own Creator in the body. And at the name of Jesus Christ every knee bends and will bend, and every tongue will confess that the Lord is Jesus Christ. For the flesh brought no dishonor to the Word—far from it; rather, it was glorified by Him. Nor, because the Son, who exists in the form of God, assumed the form of a servant, was He diminished in divinity; but rather He became the liberator of all flesh and of all creation. He, even when crucified, was attested as the Master of creation.
The sun drew in its rays, the earth quaked, the rocks were split, and the executioners recognized that truly the one crucified was the Son of God; for the body that was seen was not that of some man, but of God—in which he was present, and even while being crucified, he raised the dead. At that time the sun, indignant and unable to bear the bodily outrages committed against the common Master of all, which he willingly endured for our sake, turned away; and drawing in its rays, it showed that day to be without sunlight.
Citation. Tergwame, “Homilia de passione et cruce domin1”, khazarzar-athanasius-the-great-of-alexandria-homilia-de-passione-et-cruce-domin1:1, machine-draft, 2026. https://naxiai.com/christian/works/khazarzar-athanasius-the-great-of-alexandria-homilia-de-passione-et-cruce-domin1#s1
Colophon. Source: khazarzar ·
licence: Migne PG text (public domain); khazarzar host and the digitising project state no licence for this layer ·
model: deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash:floor ·
provider: Relace ·
cost: $0.0014 ·
generated 2026-11-15.