Work dossier · summary and historical context
This homily on Zacchaeus, attributed to Amphilochius of Iconium (ca. 340–395), is a rhetorical and exegetical sermon likely delivered in a liturgical setting. It survives in a single manuscript tradition, with no critical edition, and its attribution is traditional but unconfirmed. The text is not cited in Byzantine catenae or lectionaries, suggesting limited circulation. The homily employs a three-part argument from authority—prophets, apostles, and evangelists—to exemplify repentance and forgiveness, adapting biblical paraphrases such as Psalm 32(31):1 LXX. Its register is typical of fourth-century patristic preaching, but the work may be a later composition under Amphilochius' name.
This homily provides insight into late fourth-century exegetical and parenetic preaching on repentance, using Zacchaeus as a model. Its rhetorical structure and biblical paraphrases reflect Cappadocian homiletic techniques. The work's uncertain attribution and limited transmission highlight challenges in patristic attribution and manuscript survival. It relates to broader traditions of early Christian paraenesis, as seen in John Chrysostom's homilies on repentance, and to the reception of Luke's Gospel in patristic exegesis.
The homily is traditionally dated to the late fourth century (ca. 340–395), the period of Amphilochius' episcopacy in Iconium (modern Konya, Turkey). Amphilochius was a Cappadocian Father and contemporary of Basil the Great and Gregory of Nazianzus, active in theological controversies and ecclesiastical politics. The work is written in Greek, the liturgical and literary language of the Eastern Roman Empire. Its genre is a homily, likely delivered during a feast or commemoration of Zacchaeus, though no specific liturgical context is attested. The text survives in a single manuscript tradition, with the edition based on the Khazarzar digital collection; no critical edition or collation of variants exists. Its absence from Byzantine catenae and lectionaries indicates limited transmission, possibly due to regional or monastic preservation. The attribution to Amphilochius is traditional but unconfirmed by external witnesses, and the homily may be a later pseudepigraphon.
Apparatus · what the pipeline recorded
| Coptic | Rendering | Count | First |
|---|---|---|---|
| no glossary terms recorded | |||