Work dossier · summary and historical context
The homily 'In Lazarum' is traditionally attributed to Amphilochius of Iconium (c. 340–398), a Cappadocian Father and contemporary of Basil the Great and Gregory of Nazianzus. The text survives in a single manuscript tradition with significant lacunae in the opening sections. It is a Greek homily on the raising of Lazarus, likely delivered after a reading from John 11. The work was cited in Byzantine florilegia on the resurrection but never entered the standard liturgical cycle. The present edition is based on the 19th-century Khazarzar edition, which reproduces the 1611 Eton printing without critical apparatus. Several scriptural quotations differ from the standard Byzantine text, and variant readings from a known 10th-century Athos manuscript are not collated.
The homily is significant as a witness to late 4th-century preaching on the resurrection, reflecting exegetical and polemical traditions. It contains unique narrative embellishments, such as the claim that Jewish leaders plotted to kill Lazarus after his resurrection, which is not attested in canonical Gospels. The work also shows textual variants in scriptural quotations, offering insights into the fluidity of biblical texts in the early Byzantine period. Its attribution to Amphilochius, though uncertain, connects it to the Cappadocian Fathers and the development of early Christian homiletics.
The homily is attributed to Amphilochius of Iconium (c. 340–398), a bishop and theologian active in Cappadocia and a participant in the First Council of Constantinople (381). The work likely dates to the late 4th century, a period of Christological and Trinitarian controversy. The community was Greek-speaking and engaged in liturgical preaching, often expounding Gospel readings. The homily's focus on the raising of Lazarus reflects the importance of resurrection themes in early Christian polemic against Jewish disbelief and in shaping eschatological hope. The text survives only in a single manuscript tradition, with the earliest known witnesses from the 10th century. Attribution to Amphilochius is traditional but not securely attested before the 9th century. The homily was cited in Byzantine florilegia but never entered the standard liturgical cycle, suggesting limited circulation. The present edition does not collate the two known 10th-century manuscripts, and variant readings from the Athos codex are not reported. The base text is the 19th-century Khazarzar edition, which reproduces the 1611 Eton printing without critical apparatus.
Apparatus · what the pipeline recorded
| Coptic | Rendering | Count | First |
|---|---|---|---|
| no glossary terms recorded | |||