Work dossier · summary and historical context
The Old Georgian text of the 'Expugnatio Hierosolymae' is a translation of a lost Greek original attributed to Antiochus Strategos, a 7th-century Byzantine monk. It recounts the Persian conquest of Jerusalem in 614 CE, blending eyewitness testimony with biblical typology and hagiographic topoi. The Georgian version survives in several manuscripts, the earliest from the 10th century, and likely dates to the 8th–9th centuries. The text shows signs of scribal reworking and interpolation, especially in hagiographic and liturgical passages. It was incorporated into Georgian liturgical collections and used as a source for martyrdom narratives, influencing later Georgian historical writing. The edition provides no apparatus for the Greek Vorlage or variant readings, requiring separate text-critical studies.
The 'Expugnatio Hierosolymae' is a key source for the Persian sack of Jerusalem and its impact on Christian memory. It illustrates the transmission of Byzantine historical and hagiographic literature into Georgian, reflecting the cultural and religious ties between Palestine and Georgia. The work's incorporation into liturgical collections shows its role in shaping martyrdom narratives and historical consciousness in medieval Georgia.
The work is set in the early 7th century, when the Sasanian Persian Empire, under Shah Khosrow II, invaded Byzantine territories, capturing Jerusalem in 614 CE. The event was a major trauma for Christian communities, leading to the loss of the True Cross relic. The original Greek text, attributed to Antiochus Strategos, a monk of the Monastery of Mar Saba in Palestine, circulated in Byzantine monastic circles. The Georgian translation emerged in the 8th–9th centuries, likely through Palestinian monastic networks connecting Georgian communities in the Holy Land and the Caucasus. The text was transmitted in Georgian manuscripts, the earliest from the 10th century, and was adapted for liturgical use in the Georgian Synaxarion. Its historical accuracy is debated due to its blend of factual narrative and theological interpretation.
Apparatus · what the pipeline recorded
| Coptic | Rendering | Count | First |
|---|---|---|---|
| no glossary terms recorded | |||