Work dossier · summary and historical context
Nisibis 42 is a Syriac memrā (verse homily) traditionally attributed to Ephrem the Syrian, likely composed during his Nisibene period before 363 CE. The text survives in a single medieval manuscript (DSC 296) with scribal corrections and marginal glosses. It was later excerpted in East Syriac liturgical collections for Lent, indicating its use in monastic reading cycles. The poem personifies Death as a mourner, employs the Syriac loanword glusqomeh (from Greek γλωσσόκομον) for a purse, and alludes to the veneration of martyrs' relics. The attribution rests on the colophon of the earliest witness, but the manuscript evidence does not fix a precise date.
Nisibis 42 is significant as a witness to Ephrem's poetic and theological style, particularly his use of personification and engagement with relic veneration. Its survival in a single manuscript highlights the fragility of Syriac literary transmission. The memrā's later liturgical use in East Syriac Lenten cycles demonstrates its enduring relevance in monastic spirituality. The figurative use of glusqomeh offers insight into Syriac lexical borrowing from Greek and its theological application.
The memrā is traditionally assigned to Ephrem's Nisibene period (before 363 CE), when he served as a teacher and deacon in Nisibis (modern Nusaybin, Turkey). Nisibis was a major center of Syriac Christianity, located on the Roman-Persian frontier. The community was shaped by the legacy of the apostle Addai and the legend of King Abgar of Edessa. The text reflects themes common in Ephrem's poetry: personification of Death, veneration of martyrs' relics, and engagement with biblical figures like Moses and Judas. The Syriac term glusqomeh (a loanword from Greek γλωσσόκομον) appears figuratively, linking apostolic betrayal or doubt to material loss. The work's survival in a single medieval manuscript (DSC 296) and its later use in East Syriac Lenten lectionaries suggest a monastic readership. The edition does not record variant readings from the manuscript's marginalia, nor does it provide a full apparatus of scribal corrections.
Apparatus · what the pipeline recorded
| Coptic | Rendering | Count | First |
|---|---|---|---|
| no glossary terms recorded | |||