Work dossier · summary and historical context
The Anti-slavery Protocol is an anonymous, undated Geʿez ecclesiastical text of a legalistic and prescriptive genre, surviving in a single manuscript witness (betmas edition). Its language and formulae suggest a late 19th- or early 20th-century origin, possibly as a local Ethiopian church response to British anti-slavery campaigns. The protocol lacks liturgical or canonical adoption, and its authority remains unclear. No translation or commentary accompanies the edition, obscuring legal nuances. The text mirrors European royal protocol, referencing Queen Victoria and Emperor John IV (Yohannes IV, r. 1872–1889), and mentions Rear Admiral Sir William Hewett and a ship name 'Dampsachi', likely a Geʿez transcription of an English or Indian name. The work reflects diplomatic pressure on Ethiopia to suppress the slave trade in the Red Sea region.
The Anti-slavery Protocol is a rare example of an Ethiopian ecclesiastical legal text addressing the slave trade, reflecting late 19th-century diplomatic and moral pressures. It illustrates the intersection of Ethiopian royal theology, European colonial influence, and local church responses. Its survival in a single manuscript highlights the fragility of such documents and the need for careful study of Geʿez legal and prescriptive literature.
The protocol likely dates to the late 19th century, during the reign of Emperor John IV (Yohannes IV, 1872–1889), a period of intensified British anti-slavery campaigns in the Red Sea and East Africa. The text's opening formula, listing Victoria's titles before John's, mirrors European royal protocol and suggests a bilateral treaty structure. The Geʿez phrase 'chosen by God' adapts the English 'by the grace of God' for both monarchs, reflecting Ethiopian royal theology. Rear Admiral Sir William Hewett, who commanded the HMS *Dampsachi* (possibly a corruption of *Dampachi* or *Dampachi*), enforced the anti-slavery treaty. The sole witness, the betmas manuscript, has no known other Geʿez copies, and the text's circulation history is unknown. The protocol may represent a local ecclesiastical response to British diplomatic pressure, but its actual authority and adoption are unclear. No liturgical use or canonical recognition is recorded.
Apparatus · what the pipeline recorded
| Coptic | Rendering | Count | First |
|---|---|---|---|
| no glossary terms recorded | |||