Work dossier · summary and historical context
This anonymous Ethiopic homily (dǝrsān) for the feast of the Archangel Michael in the month of Sane (June) survives in multiple manuscripts, often bound with Marian or angelological texts. It emphasizes Michael's intercessory role and includes a narrative about Astrāʿāqos of Silkiya and his wife Afomya, with a miraculous leaf from an icon that heals. The homily is part of a larger cycle of angelological homilies for the 12th of each month in the Ethiopian Orthodox tradition. Its language and theology suggest composition no earlier than the 14th century, possibly later (15th–16th c.). The edition lacks a critical apparatus for variant readings, and the Geʿez text may contain scribal errors or interpolations.
This homily exemplifies the rich angelological tradition in Ethiopian Orthodox liturgy, particularly the veneration of Michael as intercessor. It contributes to understanding the development of hagiographic cycles around Michael and the integration of local narratives (e.g., Astrāʿāqos and Afomya) into broader Christian angelology. Its ongoing liturgical use highlights the continuity of devotional practices.
The homily survives in multiple Ethiopic manuscripts, often bound with other Marian or angelological texts, suggesting a monastic origin, possibly from the Aksumite or early Solomonic period. It is read during the month of Sane (roughly June) in the Ethiopian Orthodox tradition, on the feast of the Archangel Michael, forming part of a larger cycle of angelological homilies for the 12th of each month. The homily is undated in the manuscript tradition; its language and theological themes suggest a composition no earlier than the 14th century, but a later date (15th–16th c.) cannot be excluded. The edition does not provide a critical apparatus for variant readings across manuscripts, and the Geʿez text may contain scribal errors or interpolations not flagged in the present edition. The name Astrāʿāqos of Silkiya and his wife Afomya appear in other Ethiopic Michael narratives, indicating a shared hagiographic cycle.
Apparatus · what the pipeline recorded
| Coptic | Rendering | Count | First |
|---|---|---|---|
| no glossary terms recorded | |||