Work dossier · summary and historical context
The Geʿez hagiography of Dioscorus, transmitted in a single manuscript (Betä Mäsəḥəf 2983), recounts the life and veneration of the miaphysite patriarch of Alexandria (d. 454). Dioscorus was condemned at the Council of Chalcedon (451) for opposing dyophysite Christology, but is revered as a confessor and saint in Coptic and Ethiopian Orthodox traditions. The text likely postdates an Arabic Life (Moawad ed.) and may have been used in liturgical readings, though no direct evidence of synaxary recitation survives. The edition provides a diplomatic transcription without critical apparatus, translation, or commentary, limiting textual analysis. The work's date is uncertain, with no colophon or internal evidence to anchor it to a specific century.
This hagiography is a rare witness to the Geʿez tradition of Dioscorus, a key figure in miaphysite Christianity. It provides insight into Ethiopian Orthodox veneration of anti-Chalcedonian saints and the transmission of hagiographic literature from Arabic to Geʿez. The text's uncertain date and single manuscript highlight the need for further study of its relationship to the Arabic Life and its role in Ethiopian liturgy.
The Geʿez hagiography of Dioscorus belongs to the Ethiopian Orthodox tradition, which venerates Dioscorus as a saint and confessor for his miaphysite stance at the Council of Chalcedon (451). The text is preserved in a single manuscript (Betä Mäsəḥəf 2983) alongside other hagiographic materials, suggesting a monastic or liturgical context. Its date is unknown; it likely postdates the Arabic Life of Dioscorus (Moawad ed.), but no colophon or internal evidence anchors it to a specific century. The Geʿez version may have been translated from Arabic or composed independently, but the relationship remains unstudied. The work's transmission is limited to this single witness, with no other Geʿez copies recorded. Its use in Ethiopian synaxary readings is plausible but unconfirmed. The text reflects the miaphysite Christology of the Coptic and Ethiopian churches, opposing Chalcedonian dyophysitism and aligning with the broader anti-Chalcedonian tradition.
Apparatus · what the pipeline recorded
| Coptic | Rendering | Count | First |
|---|---|---|---|
| no glossary terms recorded | |||